Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 6,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am
Council of Tribes v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
See Marder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
See Marder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Finally: Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 4:49 pm
See Zaborowski v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:12 pm
I've seen Google intervene in some German Nokia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman In the 1992 case Quill v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am
Contingency Work Force Solutions, Inc., 2013 U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 6:42 pm
A California federal district court rejected several of Abercrombie's defenses and held that triable issues of fact exist as to whether Banafa's religion was the motivating factor in her failure to be hired.One of Abercrombie's more interesting defenses was a 1st Amendment argument that "forcing Abercrombie to grant a Look Policy accommodation to a Muslim in-store employee who wears a hijab for religious reasons would... amount to the government's compelling it to advertise a… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
Supreme Court heard argument on the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage in California, and then on the legality of the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law prohibiting the payment of federal benefits to spouses in same-sex marriages. While the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and ransgender) movement is gaining force, the fact is that, as of April 11, 2013,… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 1:20 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that parties (or at least sophisticated parties) can validly agree to mandatory venue clauses so long as the venue selected was a permissible one under California's venue statutes. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:39 pm
Even the most ardently hostile reading of the FAA does not support forcing a public prosecution into private arbitration, or finding that a prosecutor tacitly waived class or representative procedures. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am
All all three justices in Division Five of California’s Second Appellate District unanimously agreed that Bingham’s arbitration agreement (which forces all of its employees to arbitrate their claims against the company rather than file lawsuits in court) was invalid under Massachusetts law, which was also Bingham’s own choice in drafting their agreements. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:26 pm
’s fraudulent scheme to market its epilepsy drug Neurontin for off-label uses (Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
“Absolutely; it shouldn’t be eligible for the Mark [of USDA inspection] – ought to be treated the same as lungs,” wrote one agency veterinarian based in California. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am
See Gordon v. [read post]
