Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 16,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Scott V. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
(cross-petition asks for recourse on failure to dance) Antitrust Reverse Payments: GlaxoSmithKline, et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 12:05 pm
In Cicorelli v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:24 am
In Dexia Crediop S.P.A. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:59 am
Those clauses were put to the test in the Eighth Circuit’s recent decision in Marie DeMeo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
The outcome of State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
The prosecution should not necessarily be able to introduce the letter in its case in chief, but the state should pay for relocation of or a security detail for these key witnesses. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
Dixon Gas Club LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:22 pm
Kim next claims that the prosecutor engaged in improper behavior when, during her cross-examination of Kim, she asked Kim whether he was telling the truth and the State's witness was lying. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:36 am
Schnall v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
We’re pleased to cross-post a piece by our sister blog, Trading Secrets, regarding California’s peculiar take on employee non-solicitation provisions. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
A few months ago, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
The Appeals Court summarize its holdings saying, "First, the Service's estimates of snowmobile and cross-country visitors to the Forests are arbitrary. . . [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Zherka v. [read post]
