Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 28,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2014, 3:59 pm
The Call is Free, the Relief can be valuable. 1-877-793-9290 . [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 2:52 pm
That trend is expected to continue this year, but to a slightly lesser degree.Stays Pending Reexam, IPR, & CBM (grey segments represent projected data through 12/31/2015, extrapolated from actual data from 1/1/2015 through 7/31/2015)STAYS BY DISTRICTThe Northern District of California (CAND), the Eastern District of Texas (TXED), and the District of Delaware (DED) all decided a similar number of motions to stay. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
") does not seem to relate directly to injunctions. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:46 pm
” […]Id. at *12. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Jan. 12, 2017). [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Jan. 12, 2017). [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:14 am
The charge is referred to as “simple battery” because it does not involve a domestic violence categorization. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” Id. at 12. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” Id. at 12. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” Id. at 12. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
Brief for Petitioners 16; Brief for Respondent 18; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
The decision applied the basic principle that CEQA does not apply to ministerial project approvals, and further clarified that CEQA does not apply to “mixed” discretionary/ministerial approvals where the “discretionary component” does not give the agency the authority to mitigate environmental impacts. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:23 pm
It may not be used in situations where it does not produce a taxliability similar to the Form 706 method.2. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Question #9 How does the USCIS determine Priority Dates? [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
An abused spouse does not need to wait for a finding of guilty for the underlying crime in order to obtain an order of protection. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The point was repeated in J 9/12 [3]. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
According to the case law of the Enlarged Board, a point of law is of fundamental importance if the answer to it goes beyond the individual case at issue and will be relevant in a potentially large number of cases (G 1/12, Reasons, point 11).2.1 In the Board's view it appears self-evident that the point of law addressed in the question below is of fundamental importance for an indefinite number of cases. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
One individual victim filed a Request for Leave to Appeal on June 12. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Dauben Inc et al Texas Northern District Court Plaintiff: Full Sail Inc, Full Sail Inc, Full Sail Inc, Full Sail Inc Defendant: Dauben Inc, Does 1-10 Case Number: 3:2008cv00446 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. [read post]
