Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 4021 - 4040 of 4,702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
Federal warrants issued by Maine Superior Court judges are valid under Rule 41. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:59 am
All perishable foods must be held cold (41°F or below) or hot (140°F or above) during transit. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
McMahon, 360 F.3d 73, 76 (2d Cir. 2004) (reviewing "Rule 41(b) dismissals for abuse of discretion"). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:32 pm by MacIsaac
 9(1) of the Court of Appeal Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:43 am
Although Rule 41 does not apply to this case, the Court will be guided by the Eighth Circuit cases addressing the issue of whether to apply the exclusionary rule when Rule 41 has been violated. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm by WIMS
GAO's analysis of DOE's cost projections found that a repository to dispose of 153,000 metric tons would cost from $41 billion to $67 billion (in 2009 present value) over a 143-year period until the repository is closed. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:29 am by Mack Sperling
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) discarded by the Supreme Court in Iqbal and an earlier decision, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The merger of the largest American cable company with one of the largest entertainment enterprises in the world would give the combined entity control over approximately one out of every five viewing hours in the United States. [1] Not surprisingly, the deal will be heavily scrutinized and raise considerable questions of antitrust law, media diversity, and the future of internet usage. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:23 am
  Research shows that uncompensated care costs the hospital industry up to 41 billion annually. [41]  This includes both uninsured and und [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:44 am by Dennis Crouch
This article does not argue for or against the patenting of BPMs. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:05 am
The second search warrant may or may not have been necessary, but its issuance does not detract from the validity of the first search warrant. [read post]