Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 11:58 pm
The case is Whyatt v Powell. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers heard 12 December [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 3:51 pm
Barzilay v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
A subtle but intelligible distinction, at least in the view of this GuestKat.The position was similar to that in Celltech v Medimmune [2004] EWHC 1522; [2004] EWCA Civ 1331, where the courts (Jacob LJ upholding Laddie J) held that the parties had bargained to give jurisdiction to the English court concerning the scope of the licensed patents. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
”This is contrary to the normal position under English law that once final relief is granted, parties are not entitled to come back to court. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
Court of Appeals says that ESL instructors for a private educational entity are not entitled to overtime.The case is Fernandez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
And what does this have to do with Impression Products v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
The District Court first considered relevant decisions from the German courts (LG Hamburg 2 April 2015, Warner-Lambert v A Pharma; OLG Düsseldorf 1 December 2015, KKH v Pfizer), and UK court (England and Wales Court of Appeal 28 May 2015 and 13 October 2016, Warner-Lambert v Actavis). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:07 pm
There is a continuing downward trend in the volume of libel litigation in the English Courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:48 pm
"Giving us some examples of English copyright cases in the musical field, Sir Robin started with the case of Francis Day & Hunter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:26 am
The case ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust has been remitted to the trial court for argument. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am
The articles could also have had negative repercussions on the administration of justice in relation to Mme Bettencourt [99] (v) Infringement of accused’s private life Neither M. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
The court found that the employer was engaged in teaching English and that the exemption was not limited to the law’s non-inclusive list of covered institutions (Fernandez v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:50 pm
But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.Concurring, Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:00 am
Basanti v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:00 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
