Search for: "Fanning v. Fanning"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 4,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
Readers may also recall that it was Re:Sound that tried – not surprisingly unsuccessfully – to convince the Supreme Court of Canada that the word “excludes” actually means “includes”, after having not surprisingly failed to do so before the Board and the Federal Court of Appeal.But even after all of this, and eight years later, the Board still doesn’t tell us what the final tariff will actually cost Canadian fitness fans in the end. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 8:39 pm
Williams State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
Proposed Classes to be discussed: 7B. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:08 pm
Arguing for the over-the-air broadcasters in American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
As a practical matter, I can assure all graphic novel fans that no one wants to stop or even delay this movie. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Romantics v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Like the J.B. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:55 am
At issue in the case of Jia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
I am no fan of such racial and ethnic preferences. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
Fully litigated prior restraints presumptively unconstitutional—Near v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
The district court in United States v. [read post]
