Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 61,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2007, 5:44 am
NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALSFiled: 2 October 2007DAVID STANDLEY, Plaintiff,v .TOWN OF WOODFIN, an incorporated municipality in the State of NC; and BRETT OLLOMAN, Chief of Police, in his Official Capacity, Defendants. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 12:28 pm
The case, Northeast Patients Group et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
In State of Missouri v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletin Cases featured:United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
In Yelp, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
United States and Printz v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
The Court has granted certiorari in one case, Magwood v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:25 am
Supreme Court granted two orders of interest in the church-state/ religious freedom area. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:43 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of an ophthalmologist in a medical malpractice case based on the Court’s precedent in McKeen v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:42 am
Notably, the Solicitor General recommends a grant in Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Under Bell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
Check the Levin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
The Court has granted cert in Cone v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:56 am
The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, and State Farm sought a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to set aside its order granting a new trial to the plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:59 am
The Sixth Circuit today in Stewart v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:27 am
Thus, the franchisor was entitled to summary judgment on the claim, and a ruling by a California state trial court was affirmed.The prospective franchisee based his allegation of discrimination, in part, on the fact that the franchisor changed its position about granting him a franchise following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:30 pm
In Gail Ashley v. [read post]
