Search for: "House v. House" Results 4021 - 4040 of 41,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm by Russell Powell
v=TRmw1Su21iw The bill is expected to be signed by the governor on Monday. [read post]
21 Oct 2003, 3:36 am
Three weeks ago, the House of Representatives passed a similar measure. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
  The Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 came into force on 17 June 2009 and reverses the 2007 decision of the House of Lords, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Company, which barred the right to compensation for pleural plaques. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Finkel v New York City Housing Authority, 2011 NY Slip Op 07914, Appellate Division, First Department Affirming State Supreme Court’s dismissing Finkel’s Article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a 2010 New York State Division of Human Rights' determination... [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:20 am
The House of Lords gave an important judgment yesterday, in YL v Birmingham City Council, on the scope of the Human Rights Act: it ruled by a 3-2 majority that a care home which provides care and accommodation to a resident is not a "functional" public authority under section 6(3)(b). [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:33 am
The House of Lords (HL) has finally handed down judgment in the case of Stringer v HMRC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:43 am by Wendy
For those Land Law students who have recently completed the essay question on human rights and homelessness, the December 2014 hearing and last week's judgment from the case of Kanu v London Borough of Southwark which focusses on the meaning of vulnerability in the 1996 Housing Act is worth a watch / read. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:17 pm by Rick Hasen
Politico: Democrats in Pennsylvania won the majority of seats in the state House this fall, powered by voter backlash to the fall of Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am by Derek Muller
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
That’s a violation of fundamental rights and a compensable taking, argues the Cato Institute’s certiorari amicus brief in Yim v. [read post]