Search for: "House v. State"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 25,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 3:01 am
Here's the BIO in in River Center LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:28 am
The case of The Queen on the application of Evans v Secretary Of State For Defence is continuing today in the Royal Courts of Justice in London, before Lord Justice Richards and Mr Justice Cranston. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v, Rozier upheld laws charging possession of a weapon by a convicted felon against Second Amendment claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 10:04 am
Hurley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 5:09 am
In State v. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Garner v Harris, 2922 WL 193470066 (E.D. Texas, 2022)
26 May 2023, 12:57 pm
R.G.H. stated that Mr. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Housing and Community Dev. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:50 am
In Cameron v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm
In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:05 pm
Myers v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
Next week, the court will consider whether the Fair Housing Act prohibits policies that have a discriminatory effect, regardless of whether they were adopted with the intent to discriminate, in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. the Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:38 pm
In Texas Dep’t of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:26 am
[1] Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:09 pm
The Court’s 1873 decision in Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, called for a very narrow view of the Fourteenth Amendment’s applicability to state law. [read post]
