Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 19,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Counsel, 471 U.S. 626, 628 (1985) [4] Central Hudson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:58 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It is apparent, according to the Court of Justice, from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights that persons who claim to be linked to an entity included in the list annexed to Common Position 2001/931, but who are not included in it themselves, do not have the status of victims of a violation of the ECHR within the meaning of Article 34 thereof and that, consequently, their applications are inadmissible (see, Segi and Gestoras Pro-Amnistia and others v. 15… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:55 am
Today, in Morris v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
(Delighted to welcome back alumna Alexandra Huneeus, who contributes this guest post, which describes the argument of her article "Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights," forthcoming in the Cornell International Law Journal)When the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled against Chile in Almonacid v Chile (2006), then-President Michelle Bachelet (left) vowed to comply. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 10:07 am
Petition Brief in Opposition Reply Brief Amicus Brief of the Humane Society of the United States Tags: Cert Granted, First Amendment, Supreme Court Related posts Thoughts on Pleseant Grove v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am
” Background Underlying substantive proceedings In May 2014, Privacy International filed a complaint and a human rights complaint against Government Communications Headquarters (“GCHQ”) and Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs alleging that GCHQ was engaging in unlawful computer network exploitation activity; in particular, by infecting individuals’ computers and mobile devices on a widespread scale to gain access to the functions of those… [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 7:24 am
"Births increased in every state with a ban, an analysis of the data shows. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:33 am
Hardwick and Lawrence v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:06 am
In 2006, in a case styled Kansas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:12 am
United States (Bureau of Indian Affairs; 638 Contract)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Makah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
” This appears to be the first endorsement by an appellate court of the approach taken by Mr Justice Mitting on this issue in the case of TLT v (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department and (2) The Home Office [2016] EWHC 2217. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
Bumpus v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:06 pm
Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
