Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 6,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2014, 2:27 pm
The court ordered that each should get an equal share of the husband’s pension and the marital home. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Meerwarth, 71 N.J. 541, 544 (1976) (holding husband required to obtain life insurance for protection of former wife and children). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:17 am
The case concerned the application by the domestic courts of Islamic religious law (Sharia) to an inheritance dispute between Greek nationals belonging to the Muslim minority, contrary to the will of the testator (a Greek belonging to the Muslim minority, Ms Molla Sali’s deceased husband), who had bequeathed his whole estate to his wife under a will drawn up in accordance with Greek civil law. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
In a puzzling opinion, Chafino v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
Husband pleads guilty to fraud and, over wife’s objection, agrees to forfeit $3.4 million in ill-gotten gains. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 12:27 am
McDonald, the bank made a $1.5 million dollar loan to a husband and wife. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
Rasnick v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
The employee contended that the husband-wife team jointly ran both companies. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 7:10 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:52 pm
Husband challenged the trial court's entry of a qualified domestic relations order ("QDRO") awarding Wife 50 percent of any early retirement benefits the defendant-husband might receive under his employer's pension plan years after the Judgment of Divorce was entered (pre-Quade). [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:00 pm
Adamson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm
Allen, 110 PDDRR 71 (Pa.C.P. 2010) which acknowledged the Court’s authority to assess attorneys and lost income to Wife due to Husband’s failure to obtain a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:12 pm
In the Girardi v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:06 am
The Supreme Court's judgment in Velusamy v Patchaiammal yesterday drew sharp criticism from Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising, and rightly so. [read post]
11 May 2009, 8:17 pm
The Court there added, however, that such a violation could only be found in conjunction with the husband's repeated conduct of making the wife aware that he was spying on her. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:50 pm
* Giving in to cyberspace exceptionalism, a divorce court judge ordered a husband to stop blogging about the wife. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In See’s Candies, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:45 am
Thompson: The appellate court found the wife’s argument unpersuasive that the trial court placed too much emphasis on the fact that she stabbed the husband in front of the children, while placing too little emphasis on the fact that she had been the children’s primary caregiver and had been an excellent mother to them. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:02 am
According to the wife, Shell was still liable to her, since her act of laundering her husband’s work clothes for decades caused her to develop mesothelioma. [read post]
