Search for: "J. E. F." Results 4021 - 4040 of 6,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 4:37 pm by FDABlog HPM
Let’s turn to the FDC Act’s ANDA provision at FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(F)(ii) under which 5-year NCE exclusivity is discussed. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
Alegações Ao pedir a nulidade da sentença de pronúncia, a defesa alega que, nela, o juiz da Primeira Vara do Júri da Capital cometeu “patente excesso de linguagem”  e invadiu competência do próprio Tribunal do Júri, ao opinar sobre o mérito da causa. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:11 am by David Vasella
 Sie entscheidet über die Zulassung und den Entzug der Zulassung von Experten für berufliche Vorsorge. e. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  Proposed FDC Act § 744G(f)(1) states in relevant part that “[b]y October 1, 2012, the Secretary shall cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice requiring each person that owns a facility as identified in [proposed FDC Act § 744G(a)(4)(A)] or a site identified in [proposed FDC Act § 744G(f)(3)] to identify each such facility or site. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
São turistas brasileiros e estrangeiros, estudantes e mesmo moradores de Brasília que visitam a sede do tribunal aos sábados e domingos durante o período de férias. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:52 am by Rechtsanwalt
Stattdessen beinhaltete der große Kühlschrank nur Getränke und Essen für die Mitarbeiter. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by Alexandre Atheniense
Até o dia 5 de dezembro, no entanto, o produto não havia sido entregue ao consumidor e a empresa não respondia aos e-mails e solicitações do cliente. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The European Commission will launch a public consultation to clarify the procedures for notice-and-action procedures and the EU’s E-Commerce Directive, reports Out-law.com. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm
Também sustentam que seu cliente já foi citado e todas as testemunhas da fase de formação da culpa já foram ouvidas. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:09 pm
Counsel relied for this submission inter alia on certain observations made by Bharucha J. in Sumitomo Heavy Industries v ONGC, on the expression “under the law of which” in section 48(1)(e), and argued therefore that the recent judgment of the Court in Videocon Industries, on which we have commented here, is wrongly decided. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
“[W]e do not believe that a trial court in the context of a products liability action is the proper forum. . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am by David Cosgrove
Just last month the Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed the convictions of a business owner for three counts of false representation in the registration of securities, and one count each of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, tampering with records, and falsification, but reverse the remainder of his convictions. [read post]