Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 8,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 10:53 am
In the recent case of Depuy Orthopaedics v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:19 am
Repeat.Psychologists met in secret with Bush officials to help justify torture: reportConrad Black loses bid to have Supreme Court of Canada hear case over millions in back taxesB.C. teachers lose latest court fight on class size, compositionTen shocking details from the report on sexual misconduct in Canada's militaryExpert witnesses need not be independent, Supreme Court rulesProvince defends right to lay polygamy charge in Bountiful caseObese Canadians should be granted legal… [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
Burson v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am
He may be one of the most sophisticated lay constitutional interpreters never to have been corrupted by a law school education!) [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:00 am
Il y a donc un véritable arrêt des procédures. [read post]
2 May 2015, 11:13 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the conviction, relying on a 2000 decision, State v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 1:00 pm
"Dublin III Regulation: An Overview and its Potential Impacts," The Researcher, vol. 10, no. 1 (April 2015) [full-text]- Scroll to p. 2.The Human Cost of Borders: Refugees, Detainees and Families (Free Movement, April 2015) [text]"Implications of Tarakhel v Switzerlandon the Dublin Transfer System," The Researcher, vol. 10, no. 1 (April 2015) [full-text]- Scroll to p. 21.Position Paper on the EU Return Directive (PICUM, April 2015) [text]Resolution 2050 - The Human… [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
The Court is very clear that a medical examination report must contain not only clear conclusions with supporting data, but also a reasoned medical explanation connecting the two (Stefl v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:20 pm
Plaintiff in Broom v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
., elected municipal councilors – it may even be acceptable for the administrative decision-maker to have a “closed mind”, provided that closed mind is as a result of conviction rather than impropriety (Save Richmond Farmland Society v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.May 13, 2015 - 2 PM: Innovation Law Group, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:30 am
Similarly, in the UK, a Norwich order (the equivalent of the Australian provision's application) was issued for copyright infringement through which subscribers' details were disclosed to the copyright holder in Golden Eye (International) Ltd & Anor v Telefonica UK Ltd. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:21 am
Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:07 pm
It's pretty harsh to say that appointed counsel was worse than the lay petitioner himself spouting out legal pleadings filed from prison.Yet it also seems accurate. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
My dry academic monograph on the Court martial of Army Lieutenant William Calley for Vietnam’s My Lai Massacre inspired him to write an off-Broadway play. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
The Federal Circuit decided that the ‘machine or transformation’ test should always be met and the Supreme Court said that was too strict a test.I recently came across a paper by Peter Menell (here) which gave an interesting perspective on Bilski, viewing it as a missed opportunity to lay out a framework for determining the patentability of business methods. [read post]
