Search for: "Little v State" Results 4021 - 4040 of 23,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
But are you also guilty of the (much bigger) felony offense of bringing drugs into jail in violation of Penal Code sect. 4573, which states that "Except when otherwise authorized . . . any person who, knowingly brings or sends into, or knowingly assists in bringing into, or sending into, any state prison . . . or into any county . . . jail . . . any controlled substance . . . is guilty of a felony. . . . [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:15 pm
But isn't it still a little strange.Anyway, for better or worse, that's not going to be a problem here. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm by Rob McKinney
However, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
This was my first thought as well, though I'm admittedly a little geeky on procedure stuff. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:04 pm
It was an unusual situation; nonetheless, you'd have thought the government could have gotten it together at least a little earlier. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:20 am
Allegedly.You (understandably) want to strike a deal with the United States, which has indicted you. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
And Justice Klein states as much in a sharp, succinct, and crisp opinion.Good news for SLAPP jurisprudence. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Fort
In fact, the interpretation about how ICWA is a balancing statute between two sovereigns, the state and the tribe may not be all that persuasive to the Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:38 am
So I dug a little deeper.There are 78 Ninth Circuit cases that mention a "Denny's. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:09 pm
(You gotta love it, by the way, if you're the plaintiff and the case is so huge that a one percent dispute over prejudgment interest is worth an entire appeal.)Not only does plaintiff win the appeal, but Judge Graber has a funny paragraph that lightly jabs the defendants and made me chuckle a little:"Defendants also assert that the doctrine of judicial estoppel bars Plaintiff from seeking to apply state law on appeal because, before the district court, Plaintiff argued… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]