Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 4021 - 4040 of 20,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The matter therefore fell within the restriction on availability of judicial review (Rule of Court 58.3(2). [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:01 pm
The question that divides Herstein, Waldron, Marty Lederman, and others is whether an authoritative text forbidding "A or B" forbids conduct that is just A and also forbids conduct that is just B (Waldron and others) or whether it only forbids conduct that is "A and B" (Herstein).At first blush, Waldron seems obviously right about this as a matter of simple logic. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Determining that “§ 630(b) is not ambiguous,” the Ninth Circuit held that it applies to all State political subdivisions, no matter how small, “[a]s a matter of plain meaning. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
This is not just matter of form, as are the oath and verbatim transcription requirements noted in Rule 28(b)(4). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
 Sounds like a perfect set-up for a deadlock dissolution petition in the event A and B reach impasse on some critical issue jeopardizing the corporation’s viability, doesn’t it? [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:34 pm
  With all of the data exhaust a website can generate, it's very hard to differentiate the signal from the noise (ie, determine which metrics matter and which don't). [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:54 pm
” Leaving aside the somewhat peculiar notion that U.S. policy on this matter should be controlled by the opinions of Cuban-Americans rather than the entire population, the commissioned poll doesn’t really support the conclusion asserted by CDPA. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 11:31 am
  in fact, they say the bond b/t man and dog can be stronger than b/t human beings. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:53 pm
They eventually had to take the matter to court, which ruled B o A had to reimburse the couple for the attorney fees. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Although the possession claim was a statutory matter [ para 132], the availability of gateway (b) means that the statute is not incompatible with Art 8, although the statute may well have been incompatible per se. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Thus, this decision is in no way a matter of a debit order submitted without comment, which the Board of Appeal considered an implicit request for correction. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:02 am
Patent Nos. 5,447,432, 5,683,243, 6,244,861, 6,398,548 and 6,616,444); "[i]t is a bedrock principle of patent law that the claims of a patent define the invention to which the patentee is entitled the right to exclude"; "[w]hen the application of prosecution disclaimer involves statements from prosecution of a familial patent relating to the same subject matter as the claim language at issue in the patent being construed, those statements in the familial application… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:17 am by Jack Goldsmith
But on an issue that Peter did not raise (but that his post caused me to see), matters are yet more complex. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
Does it matter that the unauthorized disclosure was made in Country T? [read post]