Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 70,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The Pentagon has long resisted removing cases from commanding officers. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
The line was not marked in accordance with state law.After the explosion, a fire erupted as natural gas leaked out of the hole, causing the pipeline to be shut down. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:42 am
In what it readily acknowledged was a "close case," the Board sustained a Section 2(d) opposition brought by Mattel, Inc. against registration of the mark SOCK-UM for a "game where a labeled mat is placed on the ground or floor, participants position themselves on the mat and volley a sock back and forth from one half of the mat to the other half of the mat. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:46 am
The senior mark holder brings a trademark infringement case alleging “reverse confusion” among its potential customers. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
Cir. 2021) This is a trademark case. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
EMI had not made out a case for expediting the trial, since it had not shown any plans to exploit the NOW mark in relation to TV channels or programmes -- and it was likely thatSky's launch of its NOW TV service would take place ahead of any trial date. 4. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:18 pm
The conspiracy prosecution lodged against 22 individuals in Washington’s federal trial court marked the largest-ever Foreign Corrupt Practices Act case against individuals. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:38 pm
The lawyer representing Hermans is Mark Lanier, who as many know won the first Vioxx case that went to trial in Texas.The Humeston case gets retried as well. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:14 am
Case date: 19 May 2022 Case number: No. 21-56133 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 12:46 pm
The case at hand dealt with the names ‘ASĀVA’ and ‘RAMPUR ASĀVA’ in connection with whiskey, in light of an earlier trade mark, ‘THE ASWA’, registered under Class 33 for alcoholic beverages. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm
"BusinessCat" by brownpau is marked with CC BY 2.0.The CJEU ruled in the Ferrari case that the burden of proving genuine use of a mark lies with the owner of that mark. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 3:10 am
In any case, the Board observed, the test is likelihood of confusion.Considering the pertinent du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it sustained the opposition.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:56 am
In the case at hand, both marks share the term DIRK, making them similar in appearance and pronunciation. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 3:56 am
Applicant’s large letter “A” surrounded by a halo having a sunburst at its center is a prominent portion of applicant’s mark that further distinguishes the marks.In the case at bar, registrant’s mark features a large, heavy wings design, followed by the much smaller designation, “angelpc. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 5:15 am
The U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday vacated and remanded a decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) based on an incorrect application of the DuPont factors in determining the likelihood of confusion of a famous mark. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 5:15 am
The U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday vacated and remanded a decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) based on an incorrect application of the DuPont factors in determining the likelihood of confusion of a famous mark. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 2:14 pm
Rick Yencer of the Muncie Star-Press reports today in a story that begins:MUNCIE -- A special prosecutor will now decide whether Delaware County Prosecutor Mark McKinney and the Muncie-Delaware County Drug Task Force committed crimes in their handling of drug forfeiture cases. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm
The report considered that cases such as Paul’s case had ‘muddied the waters’ on parallel imports and recommended amendments to the Trade Marks Act 1995 to make clear that parallel imports are permitted. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:06 pm
This new evidence was in any event unlikely to have an important influence on the case, since it did not add sufficiently cogent and solid evidence of use of the earlier mark to satisfy the use conditions of section 6A.* Although the witness statement did now give some details about the size of Motu's business, there was no further evidence at all as to the use of the earlier mark in the form in which it was registered. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
In 1974, it obtained the corresponding international trade mark registration for one of these trade marks (which it had relied upon in the design case mentioned in the opening). [read post]
