Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 4021 - 4040 of 119,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 5:44 pm by Lawrence Solum
Nicole Stelle Garnett (Notre Dame Law School) has posted A Winn for Educational Pluralism (Yale Law Journal Online, May 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:36 am by Colleen McDonald and Thomas Reddy
 If the court upholds the Delaware choice of law provision, market participants may manage the impact of the Madden v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:36 am by Colleen McDonald and Thomas Reddy
 If the court upholds the Delaware choice of law provision, market participants may manage the impact of the Madden v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 5:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), may a state directly regulate commerce between tribal economic development entities on the tribe’s own reservation lands without a showing of exceptional circumstances? [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 11 May 2018 Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Reid v Newsquest (Midlands South) Ltd. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(v) Expressions of concern about constitutionalism are often used as a ‘mask’ (p. 35) to conceal political disagreement with populist movements. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Even though the other state, in our example Arkansas, may not have to provide coverage for family members if an accident by an insured occurs in Arkansas, if the accident occurs in Texas there is coverage. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:01 am by Mark J. Levin
  As an example of this “trending pushback” by state courts, the article discusses Chilutti v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 2:09 pm by zola.support.team
   The Quantity Effect on California Traffic Fatalities  When examining how rideshare services contribute to traffic fatalities, Rice University Professor Yael V. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Pulse serves to strengthen rather than weaken patent rights.Patent plaintiffs typically may recover only their lost profits or a “reasonable royalty” to compensate for the infringement, but § 284 of the Patent Act states that “the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed. [read post]