Search for: "P. T.2" Results 4021 - 4040 of 14,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Either that, or they just haven’t finished reading the questions presented yet. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:40 pm by Richard Hunt
This is especially true when the plaintiff is relying on hyper-technical discrepancies – a door that is 1/8″ too narrow or a sidewalk with a slope that is 1/2% too steep. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 8:11 am by Philippe Duquette
(Rappelons pour la petite histoire que le brevet canadien possède un terme de 20 ans à partir de la date de dépôt de ce dernier.) [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 8:11 am by Philippe Duquette
Rappelons pour la petite histoire que le brevet canadien possède un terme de 20 ans à partir de la date de dépôt de ce dernier. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Laseur, 31 Third, administrative tribunal decisions based on the Charter are subject to judicial review on a correctness standard: see Cuddy Chicks, supra, at p. 17. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Guido Paola
Si l'accord du titulaire est obtenu pendant la procédure orale, il n'est pas nécessaire d'obtenir une nouvelle fois, "conformément aux dispositions du règlement d'exécution", l'accord du titulaire du brevet, présenté comme absolument obligatoire à l'article 113(2) CBE, alors que cet accord a déjà été donné (voir G 1/88, point 5.2.3).2.4 La question qui… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
The amendments deleted a reference to B&P 17206, which had details about damage-setting for violations (1798.150(b)). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
I can’t wait to see what the court does with those. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
 In their replies to the statement of grounds of appeal, opponents 1 and 2 (respondents 1 and 2) requested that the appeal be dismissed. [...]VIII. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some Eerily Relevant SEC History When considering the SEC Musk prosecution, two cases from almost 20 years ago are uncannily relevant:  1) the 1999 SEC case (and parallel DOJ criminal prosecution) against Gary Hoke; and 2) the 2000 SEC case (and parallel DOJ criminal prosecution) against Fred Moldofsky. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Par ailleurs, bien que l’accusée ait été interpellée légalement, elle a subi une détention prolongée, soit de 2 h 50 à 7 h 15. [read post]