Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 123,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:03 am
Huber v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:26 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Ciminelli v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
You can read the trial decision in Morrow v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm
Next the Court clarifies that the taxation data of 1.2 million natural persons were made public by the applicant media, and that most of the data concerned private persons, and only “very few, were individuals with a high net income, public figures or well-known personalities within the meaning of the Court’s case-law”. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
In Urbanek v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
The case of Freddie v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:07 pm
A family court adjudication is a civil proceeding to “supervise and guide troubled youth” (Matter of Quinton A. 49 NY2d 328, [1980], Green v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Previous cases such as JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 42 related to applications to prevent publication of personal information. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:33 am
Whiston v London Strategic Health Authority (successor body in law for the Queen Charlotte’s Maternity Hospital) [2010] EWCA Civ 195; [2010] WLR (D) 66 “A claimant bringing an action in negligence for personal injury out of time had constructive knowledge of the relevant facts for the purposes of s 14 of the Limitation Act 1980 if, considered objectively, he had the knowledge which he might reasonably have been expected to acquire having regard to all the circumstances… [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:37 pm
Exch.)] and Jackson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
For a case discussing the difference in different health care provider situations, see Stalcup v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:49 am
S v Director of Public Prosecutions “The offence under section 4A(1)(b) of the Public Order Act 1986 of displaying, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, a visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress, may be established even where the harassment, alarm or distress crystallises only at the date several months after the act of displaying and at the… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
An Order of Protection is often issued by a Criminal or Family Court, and orders one person to refrain from contacting or being near a specific protected person or persons. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:12 am
The case is Jaques v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
