Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 4021 - 4040 of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Rath Packing Co. (1977) that the provision must be given “a broad meaning”? [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications and portals… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Samsung loses Dutch case against Apple over 3G patents as court gives meaning to FRAND (FOSS Patents) (EPLAW) Australia: Samsung appeals, retaliates, in patent war with Apple (Patentology) (ipwars.com) Supreme Court of Canada: Hyperlinking is not publication: Crookes v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
It was introduced as a private members bill on 12 October 2015 by Labor MP Tim Watts and co-sponsored by fellow Labor MP Terri Butler. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:50 pm by Richard Bonnifield
Public Service Commission of West Virginia[8] and Federal Power Commission v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941) (federal courts, when asked for the extraordinary remedy of injunction, will exercise sound discretion in the public interest to avoid needless friction with state policies); Younger v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Vincent Connor further examined the shifting landscape of legal service provision since the financial crisis. [read post]