Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 4021 - 4040 of 12,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
As a result, it will be case closed for National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 11:23 am
 The Court of Appeal says:"On page 4, near the end of the paragraph that started on page 3 with 'Appellants argue evidentiary error' delete the sentence 'For its part, the Attorney General offers this court no help, instead compounding the problem with a 458-page rambling respondent‟s brief plus 28-page addendum.'"Always a nice thing to have deleted (if it was initially said). [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by INFORRM
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Scott Bomboy
However, the Supreme Court in December 1970 decided on a challenge to the law, in Oregon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
The case began in 1960, when the New York Times ran a full-page advertisement paid for by civil right activists that offered support for Dr. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The case, Friends for Health: Supporting the North Shore Health Center, an Illinois nonprofit corporation, and Terry Kass, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
After the paragraph that ends with “and the recording ended”, the court added a footnote that says “[a] computer disc containing all of the pictures was admitted at trial. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am by INFORRM
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction  This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]