Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 4021 - 4040 of 7,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2010, 6:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided a case on July 9, 2010, that involved a small business person and their commercial insurance policies. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
That fee is set by a schedule based on the floor area of the units built. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
In the United States, copyright vests in a work when it is created (17 U.S.C. 302 (a))  and “fixed in any tangible medium” (17 U.S.C. 102 (a)). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:36 am by John Hopkins
I believe in the Constitution of the United States and the Seventh Amendment. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:17 pm by David Post
It is impossible to imagine this development in the absence of the DMCA immunity, just as it is no coincidence that all of the websites listed in the preceding paragraph are based in the United States, where the immunity has been most firmly embedded in the law. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Interestingly, given the amount of attention arbitration has gotten in recent years in state supreme courts around the country implementing the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm by Nancy Morawetz
Gonzales (8-1 decision rejecting broad application of the drug-aggravated-felony category to any state drug felony); Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm by Mike Sykuta
S. 281 (1988), we used those terms to refer to the importation of foreign-manufactured goods bearing a valid United States trademark without the consent of the trademark holder. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
" In response, one official said: "Those who will be transferred to the custody of our friends or allies overseas will be not transferred to the United States and then transferred further on, but rather directly from Gitmo, transferred. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP)   Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46)   Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance)   Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46)   South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP)   Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46)   United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite appearing in… [read post]