Search for: "State v Smith"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 11,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
Smith, 2013-Ohio-855 (12th Dist.) [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(a)(5) provides that a declarant is "unavailable" if he is absent from the hearing and the proponent of a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception... [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
In Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am
[A footnote lays out the details, quoting the State's brief. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm
Unlike Biden v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 11:26 am
By Eric Goldman Woodhull v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Smith in Supp. of Opp’n. to Mot. to Compel Arbitration at ¶ 5. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:36 am
[A]t trial, even if [the expert] stated he based his opinions upon the opinions of Dr. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:33 pm
") Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
Marshall v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
Smith (1940 Fla.) 194 So. 336 (operator of roller coaster held to highest degree of care equivalent to that of a common carrier); Bibeau v. [read post]
