Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 4021 - 4040 of 15,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
The five dissenting judges argued that this “evidentiary privilege” — traced to the Supreme Court’s 1953 decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
Brockler, supra.The Supreme Court’s opinion goes on to explain that[b]efore he was indicted, Dunn denied any involvement in Adams's death and told Cleveland police that at the time of the murder, he was with his girlfriend, Sarah Mossor, and her friend Marquita Lewis. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am by Rebecca M. Guidry
  The Fifth Circuit affirmed the federal district court’s order denying[3] SRA-L’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by applying the Circuit’s well-established six-factor test of Clark v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
V Nonimmigrant Visa The bill also expands a special visa category that promotes family reunification called the V nonimmigrant visa type. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
[b]ecause an important person in the Superintendent’s Office has conspired with [Santiago] to take money that is designated for the instruction of our children and funnel it into [Santiago’s] bank account. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:56 am
”  Wikipedia’s entry on the topic provides some examples. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”Similarly, Solo’s director of product development submitted a declaration to the PTO stating that (a) the lid had the same basic functional characteristics of competing lids and (b) the configuration didn’t affect the cost of manufacturing the lid to the disadvantage of others in the marketplace. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
We remind all litigants of rule 8.124(b)(3)(A) of the Rules of Court, which states that an appendix must not '[c]ontain documents or portions of documents filed in superior court that are unnecessary for proper consideration of the issues. [read post]