Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 8,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 10:29 am
The Act also lists a number of factors to be considered in order to determine that a holder has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement.Vermont v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:00 am
The Federal Circuit tempered this holding by citing to Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm
In the first case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:54 pm
For example, Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Association v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:46 pm
Eric Holder, Jr. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:09 pm
Last month I wrote about Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:00 am
R. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:38 am
The state began garnishing his wages to that end —25 percent of his earnings each month. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Holder that the heart of the Voting Rights Act is not “constitutional” in that sense and is not even a superstatute entitled to particular respect. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Holder that the heart of the Voting Rights Act is not “constitutional” in that sense and is not even a superstatute entitled to particular respect. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Case T 647/11 Asos plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Roger Maier, a decision of the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) this past Tuesday, is just one piece in a rather larger jigsaw of interlocking litigation between two assertive brand owners. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:06 am
In Mozes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Patently-O also analyzed two decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that came down yesterday and relate to attorney fee-shifting in patent litigation: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
In the first new decision, Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
(Copsey v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:33 pm
The court states that 'the record reflects that negotiations have been ongoing,' [...] but, as the district court even acknowledged, Motorola asserts otherwise--that Apple for years refused to negotiate while nevertheless infringing the '898 patent [...] [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
SEP holders would point to Chief Judge Rader's dissent all the time. [read post]
