Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 13,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2013, 8:47 am
Consumers looking for jackets with NFL team logos might find non-branded jackets to be reasonable substitutes if they are lower priced. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 12:46 pm
Bland v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:59 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued its opinion in Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:01 am
These are the questions that have sparked a short and thought-provoking decision from SDNY Judge Marrero in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:41 am
Bell BCI Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
In Bishop of Victoria Corporation Sole v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:01 am
In Adams & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:12 am
HR Acquisition Corporation I v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
In a long-awaited opinion issued on August 15 in Parkcentral v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
On Thursday 9 June it will hear the compliance cost issues in the cases of Price Waterhouse Coopers v Saad Investments Company Ltd & Anor (Bermuda) and Singularis Holdings Ltd v Price Waterhouse Coopers (Bermuda). [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
Consider the prison-industrial complex, where states force inmates to pay monopoly prices while suppressing competition for commissary items, phone services, medicine, and more. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:56 am
On May 3rd (yesterday) the ILB reported on the May 2nd Indiana Supreme Court decision in Paul Joseph "Jay" Kelley, III v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
Cameron analyzed matters similarly with regard to Kentucky's price-gouging law, which limits charging supposedly "grossly" "excess[ive]" prices during an emergency.[5] An association of online merchants claimed that the law, as applied to sales on Amazon.com, violated the Dormant Commerce Clause's extraterritoriality prong: Amazon requires online third-party sellers to set a single national price for goods and doesn't permit them to… [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:53 pm
” In Branti v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:54 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:54 pm
Amgen v. [read post]