Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 4021 - 4040 of 7,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2021, 5:42 am
 This brings us to Justice Gorsuch's decision in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:23 pm
"The title of a statute may be resorted to . . . only in case of ambiguity in meaning, and it may not alter or limit the effect of unambiguous language in the body of the statute itself" (McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 123 [a]). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am by Robert Chesney
Even aliens who are in the United States illegally may bring constitutional challenges, see, e.g., Plyler v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Executive Branch must honor that decision, which grants Baez-Sanchez a waiver of inadmissibility so that he may seek a U visa from the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
Por isso, preferiu fazer um exame mais aprofundado do caso na ocasião do julgamento por parte da Turma, que irá analisar o mérito. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:01 am by admin
  In somewhat stark contrast to the yet ongoing Google case in Europe, the FTC says: “After an extensive review of the evidence, the Commission determined that the evidence did not provide a reason to believe that Google’s change to the design of its search results page harmed competition or consumers …”  With Google having just been reported to have submitted proposed concessions to the European Commission, it appears that the enforcement outcome… [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am by Rick Hills
In other words, the pro-federalism rhetoric of the Cato Institute in Comstock may come back to haunt them in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  677 (1995) Read the “Juror’s Handbook” at www.fija.org   Week 10:  Jurors and the Death Penalty Ring v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Peter J. Sluka
That’s precisely the issue that the Court considered in the recent case of Hammad v Jamal Kamal Corp, 2020 N.Y. [read post]