Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 4021 - 4040 of 32,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Antitrust Today
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has upheld an 18-month prison sentence in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:35 am by Viking
Another collateral consequences note, from United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
Federal Election Commission, struck down such contribution limits, explicitly relying on the Citizens United decision and on Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion which states that “ingratiation and access . . . are not corruption. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
United States for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ben Einhouse and Victor Pinedo at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Amanda Frost
In 2018, the government announced that the 2020 census would include a question to determine the citizenship status of every person in the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:59 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States, the justices are presented with the First Step Act, passed in 2018. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
United States and Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Queen on the Application of Medical Justice v Secretary of State for the Home Department  [2011] EWCA Civ 1710 - read judgment People who make unsuccessful claims to enter or remain in the United Kingdom cannot be removed without being given sufficient time for a lawyer to prepare a proper challenge to their claim. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:29 pm by Ryan Goodman
Courtesy of the ICJ) The post Unpacking the Int’l Court of Justice Judgment in South Africa v Israel (Genocide Case) appeared first on Just Security. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
The Department of Justice announced that the United States has partially intervened in a qui tam action pending in the Northern District of California. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:07 am by Ronald Mann
” For Roberts, because Babcock “is not acting as a member of the National Guard of the United States all the time,” his salary as a dual technician is not a payment “wholly” for work “as” a member of that service. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by INFORRM
This assessment parallels the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test articulated by Justice Harlan in Katz v. [read post]