Search for: "United States v. Peoples"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 22,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The Justices are busy people with urgent practical responsibilities. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:17 am
Tailgating is a major problem in Florida and throughout the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:09 am
The United States Government Accountability Office published a report in August 2018 examining the nature of the breach and follow-up work. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am
With its 25 electoral votes up for grabs, the winner in Florida would become the next President of the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
They argued that, following the Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) judgment (among other things), the ERO was obliged to add their names to the electoral register. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:10 am
Carlo V. di Florio, Director, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations I expect the full text of his remarks will be published in the next few days, but these are my notes. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:10 am
Carlo V. di Florio, Director, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations I expect the full text of his remarks will be published in the next few days, but these are my notes. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:55 am
Recently, I had the opportunity to sit down with Paul Michel, who we in the patent community know as the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its Community word mark IMPULSE in the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy [the product seems to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray]. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
