Search for: "Witt" Results 4021 - 4040 of 4,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  (39:32) The CIiCU hosts are: Brian WittMemberFarleigh Witt, Attorneys at Law 121 SW Morrison Street, Suite 600Portland, Oregon 97204Telephone: 503-228-6044 Fax: 503-228-1741 http://www.farleighwitt.com Guy MessickMemberMessick & Weber P.C. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:05 am
Benjamin Wittes is uncompromising in his take on James Comey's testimony.... [read post]
18 May 2007, 4:30 am
" Benjamin Wittes has this essay online at The New Republic. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:00 pm
Then there's Scalia's opinion in Blakely, which inspired The Atlantic's Benjamin Wittes to write:In the incoherence of its principle, the awesome scope of its impact, and its sheer contempt for so many different institutions in American life, Blakely stands out as the single most irresponsible decision in the modern history of the Supreme Court.In Blakely, Justice Scalia went overboard with the italics (really, subtlety isn't his strong suit) to tell us… [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:59 pm
Attorney purge story:  Ben Wittes at the New Republic summarizes: Less than a year later, Gonzales replaced Ashcroft as Comey's boss. [read post]
17 May 2007, 2:12 am
" Ben Wittes nails it:At least as Comey relates it, this affair is not one of mere bad judgment or over-aggressiveness. [read post]
17 May 2007, 2:12 am
" Ben Wittes nails it:At least as Comey relates it, this affair is not one of mere bad judgment or over-aggressiveness. [read post]
15 May 2007, 5:42 am
A federally funded study under way in Trenton is trying to determine whether Megan's Law is worth the cost of its 'enormously expensive' monitoring and enforcement requirements, said Phillip Witt, a consultant. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
Rumsfeld decision.It must also be admitted, in my view, that although "meaningful, probing judicial review has a more substantial place in this war than the administration allows, it has a far-more-limited one than many civil libertarians and human-rights advocates imagine," as Brookings Institution guest scholar Benjamin Wittes writes in a forthcoming June/July Policy Review article.Wittes and other moderate-minded experts of diverse political views appear to agree on the need… [read post]
14 May 2007, 4:44 am
Available online from The New Republic: Benjamin Wittes has an essay entitled "No Comparison: Alberto Gonzales digs himself a deeper hole. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:14 am
"We don't know whether Megan's Law really works," said Witt [a consultant on the study], who helped create the risk-assessment system used by New Jersey's courts to classify sex offenders. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:22 pm
"We don't know whether Megan's Law really works," said Witt, who helped create the risk-assessment system used by New Jersey's courts to classify sex offenders. [read post]
6 May 2007, 3:32 am
“We don’t know whether Megan’s Law really works,” said Witt [a consultant on the study], who helped create the risk-assessment system used by New Jersey’s courts to classify sex offenders. [read post]
1 May 2007, 10:18 pm
Benjamin Wittes, in Winner Takes Some (New Republic (4/30)), favors the Court's apparent new requirement that all challenges to abortion restrictions be brought in the form of as-applied suits. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:44 am
" Benjamin Wittes has this essay online today at The New Republic. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
Witt (I still can't get a good free link for Witt), which together hold that when a prospective juror's views would "prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath," the trial court may remove that juror for cause. [read post]
               (49:46)The CIiCU hosts are:Brian WittMemberFarleigh Witt, Attorneys at Law 121 SW Morrison Street, Suite 600Portland, Oregon 97204Telephone: 503-228-6044 Fax: 503-228-1741 http://www.farleighwitt.com Guy MessickMemberMessick & Weber P.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:35 pm
Did I think Witt's goal in last night's Game 4 should have counted? [read post]