Search for: "Young v. State" Results 4021 - 4040 of 8,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Susan Brenner
The agents had found a package containing what appeared to be evidence that “Ace” had sexually molested a young girl. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Karen Hoffmann
Her first post will discuss the S.A.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:21 am
My weekly podcast roundup of the top family law news and best family law blog posts:The Week in View 31st January 2009Stories/posts referred to in this podcast:Meddling state has picked the wrong target - Mail on SundayAbsent parents who don't pay maintenance could lose passports - The TimesAbsent parents may lose passports - BBC NewsWe must brave the rage, and take on won't-pay fathers - The GuardianJudith's Divorce Blog: DRACONIAN CHILD SUPPORT MEASURESSocial services… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm by David Lat
Rogue States (aka Super-Smelly Burger Joint). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm by BuckleySandler
Pursuant to Section 1077 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the report covers (i) the evolution and current state of the private lending market, (ii) the characteristics of consumers of private student loans, (iii) consumer protections, including recent changes and possible gaps, (iv) fair lending compliance information currently available and its implications, and (v) statutory or legislative recommendations to improve consumer protections. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 1:54 pm
Note: The two previous pieces published in The Yale Law Journal Pocket Part this summer are Agency Preemption Inputs in Riegel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Have our views of the goal or purpose of a free state changed over time? [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:12 am
  The document also stated Kilgore's agreement to "reimburse Custodian for any reasonable expenditures required for the proper care of said Child. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]