Search for: "A Thomas"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 66,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 6:30 pm
Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett, also joined with the majority opinion. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm
Another possible answer is that the Supreme Court is not sure it would uphold the use of Rogers at all if push came to shove even if it punted on the question here (see Justice Kagan's non-flattering language about "whatever you make of Rogers" and Justice Gorsuch's concurrence–joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett–expressing general skepticism about "where the Rogers test comes from" and recommending that lower courts not lose sight of its… [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
The majority opinion stated that the result of the 2021 map ran afoul of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, disallowed the redistricting, and ordered Alabama to create a second majority-black district because black people comprised 27% of Alabama's population.Clarence Thomas, voting with the minority, opined that the 1965 Voting Rights Act did not require Alabama to "intentionally redraw its longstanding congressional districts so that black voters can control a number of seats roughly… [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
The post Justice Thomas's Dissent in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
Department of Education relisted a petition raising this issue twice before denying review over a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
In his welcome remarks, Dean Thomas J. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
He explains the somewhat complicated lineup, which includes dissents from Justice Clarence Thomas (joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch and in part by Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito) and Alito (joined by Gorsuch). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am
” But Section 2 “demands no such thing,” Thomas insisted. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:31 am
“JUSTICE THOMAS notes, however, that even if Congress in 1982 could constitutionally authorize race-based redistricting under §2 for… Continue reading The post The Kavanaugh Concurrence appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:55 am
Justice Kagan authored the unanimous opinion for the Court, while Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett, each filed concurring opinions. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:55 am
Justice Kagan authored the unanimous opinion for the Court, while Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett, each filed concurring opinions. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
I think some of it comes from the opinions issued by Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas, who wrote separate opinions concurring, but saying the Court should have gone further and reversed protections for strikers. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
., at 944 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
The post “Progressive Judges May Have Found a Use for Clarence Thomas’ Terrible Guns Ruling” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:47 am
It will shock you not at all to learn which two Supreme Court justices blew off the financial disclosure deadline. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
Joyner's comments included in a New York Times article on the controversy surrounding the transgender college swimmer Lia Thomas were completely anodyne and well within the bounds of what would be protected under any reasonable free expression policy at an academic institution. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In an article on cancel culture in the Journal of Free Speech Law, Thomas Kelly illustrates cancel culture by arguing that a "relevant test for today’s college students would be the extent to which they are willing to tolerate speakers who earnestly argue for propositions such as the following: (1) That people who are currently in the United States illegally should be deported to their country of origin. (2) That affirmative action should be abolished because it unjustly… [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:06 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:44 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Justice Thomas delays disclosures after reports of travel, property sale (Ann E. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:35 am
My new essay at The Hill explains how Harlan Crow’s latest move – declining a production request from the Senate Judiciary Committee – may end up forcing the Supreme Court justices to finally admit that they are governed by federal ethics legislation. [read post]
