Search for: "AT&T"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 881,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2008, 6:22 pm
The House Armed Services Committee is today discussing the future of the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy which discriminates against LGBT Americans in the armed forces. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 am
[official profile, PDF] said Tuesday that he would not support a moratorium on discharging individuals from the military pursuant to the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy while Congress conducted a review of the practice. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:15 pm
Tweet Tags: football, sports, wacky warningsDon’t drink the ink; also, sports decals don’t provide safety protection is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:53 am
[JURIST] The US House of Representatives and the Senate Armed Services Committee [official websites] on Thursday advanced compromise legislation to repeal the military's "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy [10 USC s. 654; JURIST news archive], sending it to a vote of the full Congress. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:00 pm
"Court: Gov't Can't Hold Cuban Militant. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
Wiley Rein, WilmerHale, Cleary Gottlieb, Crowell & Moring, and Arnold & Porter are advising on regulatory and antitrust aspects of AT&T's proposed $39 billion acquisition of Deutsche Telekom's T-Mobile USA unit--a deal that figures to receive close scrutiny from U.S. regulators. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:29 am
[JURIST] Lawyers for the US Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday asked the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official websites] to overturn a ruling that the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST news archive] is a violation of service members' constitutional rights. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
The memo is seen as a response to the uncertain future of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST news archive] policy, arising from the recent injunction [JURIST report] by the US District Court for the Central District of California [official website] and the... [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
This case is the second challenge to the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy after the SCOTUS' 2003 decision on Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Dec 2004, 4:27 am
[JURIST] Twelve homosexuals who were expelled from the US military because of their sexual orientation filed a lawsuit in Boston on Monday, challenging the constitutionality of the Pentagon's 11-year-old "don't ask, don't tell" policy. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 2:44 am
Don't allow it. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 11:07 pm
Rumsfeld), a constitutional challenge to the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ban on lesbian, gay and bisexual service members.See our earlier coverage here and here. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:24 am
Santa Barbara does for the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell debate. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) [official website] introduced the Military Readiness Enhancement Act of 2010 [text, PDF], which would repeal the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy [10 USC § 654 text; JURIST news archive]. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
This case is the second challenge to the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy after the SCOTUS' 2003 decision on Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:23 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Thursday unanimously vacated [opinion, PDF] a district court ruling that the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST backgrounder] was a violation of service members' constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:55 pm
Gates, in which the Court was asked to review the US military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy [10 USC § 654 text; HRC backgrounder], under which openly gay servicemen and women are subject to discharge. [read post]
24 Apr 2006, 6:01 pm
[JURIST] A federal judge in Boston Monday dismissed [ruling, PDF] a suit filed in 2004 by twelve members of the US armed forces [JURIST report] represented by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN) [advocacy website] challenging the military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy [Wikipedia backgrounder; SLDN timeline, PDF] requiring them to keep their sexual orientation secret or face [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
Denying reality by arguing over definitions: "One of the most powerful ways to defeat your enemies is to control their language, deny them the ability to even name that which they oppose much less defeat it" The post Woke Twitter Claims “Woke” Doesn’t Exist If You Can’t Precisely Define It first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:39 am
There are also informal (wink wink, nudge nudge) requirements, such as being able and willing to jump through the ridiculous hoops necessary in some The post We Don’t Know What We Don’t Know, Part 1 appeared first on Legal Reader. [read post]
