Search for: "Corporations 1 through 5" Results 4041 - 4060 of 8,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
’” [1] The Chicago Cubs seek reprieve as a way to sell the organization in a tight credit market to an eager buyer, not willing to take on the debt of the parent corporation to its creditors. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am by Bill Henderson
Thread 1: historical analogs In hindsight, I began the first thread in the summer of 2022 through a series of three historically grounded essays. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Andrew J. Grotto
Export Control Law Russia has long been an avid pursuer of sensitive dual-use technologies through clandestine means. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:58 am by Ed Sim
First check leads in 5 founding teams, all in stealth. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:10 am by Dan Harris
 See also our China Scam Week series, where In Part 1, we wrote about the scam of tricking someone to come to China to sign a deal. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 10:27 am by The White Law Group
  Corporations, partnerships, LLCs, trusts, 501(c)(3) organizations, employee benefit plans and a “family office” or “family client of that office owning investments in excess of $5 million may be able to qualify if they meet certain standards. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
SAIF Corporation is Oregon's not-for-profit, state-chartered workers' compensation insurance company. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:02 am by Joe May
But Lee Goodman, one of the Republican commissioners, said in an interview that contributors seeking to mask themselves through a privately held company or limited liability corporation should think twice. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:07 pm
On the motion for summary judgment in the second action: Plaintiff-two’s first cause of action is for sexual harassment in violation of Executive Law § 296(1)(a) through the creation a hostile work environment. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:59 am
Confirmed outbreak cases have been documented in Alabama (1), Connecticut (1), Michigan (1), Missouri (3), North Carolina (3), New Jersey (1), Ohio (2), Pennsylvania (1), and Virginia (1). [read post]
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
" [11] The relevant consideration is whether the process employed was either rational or employed in a good faith effort to advance corporate interests even if a judge or jury considering the matter after the fact, believes a decision to have been “substantively wrong, or degrees of wrong extending through stupid to egregious. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:45 am by Gene Takagi
Requirement 1 – Self-dealing Safe Harbor Rules The first requirement for a valid unanimous written consent of a transaction with an interested director turns to the procedural mechanisms that would otherwise be encouraged if the transaction were instead approved at a meeting. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:00 am by Mark Herrmann
Now that I’ve read the policy, it turns out that, even when I’m typing on my own time about my own issues, I’m supposed to (1) follow our corporate code of business conduct, (2) respect all copyrights and trademarks, (3) maintain confidentiality, (4) give only personal references (I suppose this is to avoid providing employment references that could expose the company to liability), (5) not attribute content to my employer unless the employer has given… [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:33 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Lastly, the Court granted leave for LAMPERS to pursue a future Section 220 demand in which it was permitted to make arguments based on the materials it obtained through the instant action. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
Road map for proving TBE ownership: Step 1: Corporate documents are NOT conclusive evidence; trial testimony and other evidence may trump corporate documents when deciding TBE  On appeal, Berlin argues that the trial court erred because it overlooked the corporate documents. [read post]