Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 16,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 7:53 am
Did the trial court improperly restrict the defense’s cross examination? [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
January 11, 2019) and Cross, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The directive states that, The collection of foreign private commercial information or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the national security of the United States or its partners and allies. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:29 pm
Section 22(6) of the Act states that “a communication…is taken to be made by the person responsible for determining the content of the communication”; for taking certain action in respect of infringing copies (such as exhibiting them in public commercially or offering them for sale or hire) under Part V, Division 5, Subdivision C of the Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:29 pm
Section 22(6) of the Act states that “a communication…is taken to be made by the person responsible for determining the content of the communication”; for taking certain action in respect of infringing copies (such as exhibiting them in public commercially or offering them for sale or hire) under Part V, Division 5, Subdivision C of the Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 11:55 am
JLS-v-Edge-Complaint [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In Fortgang v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
Cross-Border Data Transfers Under the GDPR The GDPR is the gold standard on data privacy. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 1:16 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See for example, R. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:41 pm
See Vance v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am
Veterans Land Bd. of State, 352 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2011), and KCM Financial LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
This is consistent with other judgments of the Court such as Actavis v Boehringer Ingelheim in which it was held if the circumstances of the required cross-undertaking were to change materially – for instance if the Secretary of State for Health were subsequently to seek to be made a party to the cross-undertaking – then the applicant should be given the further opportunity to reassess the situation and decide whether it wished to continue with the… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case, TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:13 pm
The drug trafficking was accomplished by crossing a state line. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:35 pm
The best guidance on the constitutional parameters of a preventative detention scheme comes from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
