Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 4,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
Subdivision (c) of section 4545 of the civil practice law and 22 rules, as added by chapter 220 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read 23 as follows: 24 [(c)] (a) Actions for personal injury, injury to property or wrongful 25 death. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
A recent case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Cherry v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 8:52 am
The Second Circuit held in State Teachers Retirement Board v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:13 pm
(b) The Account Statement must be distributed at least monthly in the case of pools with net assets of more than $500,000 at the beginning of the pool’s fiscal year, and otherwise at least quarterly; Provided, however, That an Account Statement for the last reporting period of the pool’s fiscal year need not be distributed if the Annual Report required by paragraph (c) of this section is sent to pool participants within 45 calendar days after the end of the fiscal year.… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.430(d). 5 Fla. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:46 pm
As I mentioned yesterday, the petitioner’s brief in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
§ 3583(d) (2007), the statute was otherwise silent about this particular condition. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:15 pm
(iii) That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
C. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
C. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
Jefferson County District Court No. 07CR912 Honorable Randall C. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
by Michael D. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
Now he has an answer: next month, as a pleasant hors d'oeuvres to the European judicial Christmas break, the Court of Justice of the European Communities will be hearing arguments in Case C-569/08 Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:09 am
The Minnesota Supreme Court first recognized a cause of action for negligent credentialing two years ago in the case of Larson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
Arguing otherwise is a sure path to losing the Appeal. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
The corporation is operated as a distinct business entity; b. funds and assets are commingled; c. adequate corporate records are maintained; d. the nature and form of the entity’s ownership and control facilitate misuse by an insider; e. the business is thinly capitalized; f. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
The judge's determination to permit cross-examination, nonetheless, resulted in the introduction of hearsay that the jury was otherwise not permitted to hear, thereby denying defendant his constitutional right of confrontation.... [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
However under the tests set out by Arden J in Hanoman v Southwark L B C [2008] AER(D) 146 [para 47] (our note here), there was a collateral contract in this case, “The terms of the collateral contract can be gleaned from the documents signed by Miss Scrowther, the letter sent by Mr Botsford on 3rd October 2006 and the FAQs and the fact that Miss Scrowther signed the authority and paid over the £31,250 to Watermill on completion”. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
See Konop v. [read post]
