Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 28,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2020, 2:14 pm
This does not constitute an exhaustive list of measures proposed by the UK Government. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:59 am
If it does, run a quick search on SSRN for the word "jury. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:59 am
§ 230(c)(1). [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:34 pm
The 1-year contact period begins at the earlier of the end of the public health emergency (COVID-19) or the date 12 weeks after the employee commenced the employee’s leave. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
Co., No. 12 CIV. 6494 DLC, 2013 WL 4005109, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:33 pm
” Id. at *12 (text added). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:02 pm
Professor Zhiwei Tong and other scholars also address questions that the audience may have. 12:00-1:30 PM Lunch Break Lunch will be provided. 1:30-2:30 PM Presentation Professor Backer presents his paper on Chinese constitutionalism. 2:30-2:45 PM Break 2:45-4:00 PM Comments and Panel Discussion Participating Scholars provide comments on the paper presented in the afternoon and form a panel discussion on the topic of the paper. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
A: The President does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
”.SEC. 12. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:38 pm
‘422 Patent ClaimThe ’442 patent application was filed on September 12, 2005, and claimed priority to the date the ’766 patent was filed: August 1, 1996. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Lord Lewison, albeit obiter, found that Fernandez was actually concerning a notice under s.21(1) HA 1988, not s.21(4)(a) and then In order to see whether the notice complies with the statutory requirement, one must see what it does. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Lord Lewison, albeit obiter, found that Fernandez was actually concerning a notice under s.21(1) HA 1988, not s.21(4)(a) and then In order to see whether the notice complies with the statutory requirement, one must see what it does. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
(The Juror No. 1 case which is playing out across several different tribunals discusses these issues, as does Flagg v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 10:28 am
Rate 1/1/19 >9.5 hrs/day or >55 hrs/week n/a 1/1/22 >9.5 hrs/day or >55 hrs/week n/a 1/1/20 >9 hrs/day Or >50 hrs/week n/a 1/1/23 >9 hrs/day or >50 hrs/week n/a 1/1/21 >8.5 hrs/day or >45 hrs/week n/a 1/1/24 >8.5 hrs/day or >45 hrs/week n/a 1/1/22 >8 hrs/day or >40 hrs/week >12 hrs/day 1/1/25 … [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
In addition, the Department of Revenue would assess twelve (12) points to your record. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
In addition, the Department of Revenue would assess twelve (12) points to your record. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
In addition, the Department of Revenue would assess twelve (12) points to your record. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
In addition, the Department of Revenue would assess twelve (12) points to your record. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
With its letter of 13 May 2016, the appellant filed a new main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5. [read post]
