Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 4041 - 4060 of 5,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2011, 7:12 pm by Sean Hayes
Additionally, if the due diligence leads to lack of respect by your company or client for the counter-party you have found either the wrong partner or our involved with a company or client that does not understand and will, likely, never understand the value of international partnerships and the uniqueness of international business. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:13 pm
As such, the use of a fictitious name or names of third party indicates that [the defendant] does not have a privacy interest in the phones. [read post]
28 May 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Although it is true that the Boards are possessed of inquisitorial powers (A 114(1)), these powers do not convert them from judicial into administrative tribunals. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:40 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Tomassi Law Associates, LLC www.attorney-ri.com 1-888-RI-LAWLINEFlorida Gov. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am by Ian Barlow, Associate
McDowell, 794 F.2d 100, 110 (3d Cir. 1986) (indicating that a trustee does not violate his duty if it is “prudent to refrain from bringing an action”) (citation omitted). [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:29 am by Mandelman
”  That’s 50 to 1, which is even better than the roulette wheel in Las Vegas. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am by Steven Hansen
Section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA requires that certifications for children's products be based on tests conducted by a CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment body (also commonly referred to as a third party laboratory or simply as a laboratory). [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
FLIR identified the false statements as (1) Sierra conducted an independent, third party test, and (2) “17 drops and counting …The ONLY rugged thermal imager,” conveying that FLIR cameras break immediately by contrast. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
This development must be noted because the unqualified acceptance of `Lie-detector tests' in India's criminal justice system could have the unintended consequence of encouraging their use by private parties.16. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:29 pm by Paul A. Prados
  There are a few good reasons to file and not seek service: 1. you want to preserve the statute of limitations while you gather more information; 2. you are not sure if you wish to proceed; 3. some other reason known only to the filing party. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:35 am by Steven Hansen
The Commission's current action does not affect that stay of enforcement; accordingly, and as described in the December 28, 2009, notice (74 FR 68591-68592), such stay will continue until the respective notices of requirements for laboratory accreditation are published.\1\ The Commission voted 4-1 to approve publication of this notice. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Extremely difficult to regulate these very sophisticated entities always 1-2 steps ahead of their regulators. [read post]