Search for: "Doe VI " Results 4041 - 4060 of 5,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 6:15 am
  It did not purchase the receivables for any price (at least, if it did, the record does not show what that price was). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Part VI then looks at how the Supreme Court has understood “freedom ... of the press” since 1931, the first year that the Court struck down government action on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 4:03 am by Giesela Ruehl
Finally, the position of the European Law Institute vis-à-vis other existing “networks” and organizations, the official organs of the European Union, and other organizations, worldwide, aiming at the harmonization of law, is highlighted. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
  But the bill the President just signed does none of these things. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
  But the bill the President just signed does none of these things. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Thus, the case “does little to bolster Starbucks' argument that a single-digit source confusion indicator produced by a survey that did not present the relevant terms in context is probative of a likelihood of dilution by blurring. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm by Orin Kerr
The court concludes that it does, although that conclusion strikes me as incorrect. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:16 pm by Barry Barnett
  And many see that they can actually make inroads with some voting blocs by railing against “activist judges”—by which they seem to mean any judges who reach results that the person hurling the ad hominem does not like. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:00 am by WSLL
  Appellee maintains the district court correctly concluded the WUCCC does not prohibit it from charging a fee for optional payment methods it offers to its customers after credit had been extended.Holdings:  The Court upheld the reversal of the Administrator’s order.In an overview of the WUCCC, the Court discussed credit service charges as well as the additional, delinquency, deferral and limited default charges enumerated in the statute. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Section 1104, unlike §1104-a, does not give the respondent shareholder the right to purchase the petitioner's shares for fair value. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:24 am by Kent Scheidegger
Correlation does not prove causation.Correlation does not prove causation.Correlation does not prove causation. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by Guest Blogger
Indeed, Jackson himself opposed the Bank of the United States because its federal charter gave it a legal privileged, monopoly status vis a vis all other banks. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Articles 34 and 36 of the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: The Court's Discretion Amokura Kawharu Faculty of Law, University of Auckland Abstract: The opening paragraph of art 34(2) Model Law provides that “an arbitral award may be set aside by the court…”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Expressing something in formulaic language, however, does not mean that what is being expressed is a law of nature. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 10:37 pm by V.D.RAO
The appellant has questioned the choice of the audit firm also, on the ground that the said firm does audit work for several companies belonging to different branches of the Birla Group, being the industrial house having presence in several areas in the corporate sector of this country. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:37 am by Stephen Wermiel
The Supreme Court’s fascination with the problems of preemption in recent years does not shed a lot of light on what the Court might do with the Arizona case. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm by John Palley
  It should be noted that accepting a claim does not mean the PR will pay the entire claim. [read post]