Search for: "Doe v. Smith" Results 4041 - 4060 of 7,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
 According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
 Here—and unlike plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
On the merits, I agree with Judge Pauley that—at the lower court level, at least—there is just no way around the fact that Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Peter Margulies
On the Fourth Amendment, Judge Pauley’s opinion also counsels a salutary caution on the premature burial of Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Judge Pauley sustains the NSA program under the Constitution.Judges Leon and Pauley have to deal with a Supreme Court ruling from 1979, Smith v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court holding in the 1979 case of Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:11 am by Dennis
Best Law Practice Management Blog – Adam Smith, Esq.4. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
We start to feature a few clips from the conference talks recordings such as this one from David Smith on HMOs, and landlords sigh with relief at the outcome of the Johnson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:09 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, it does not eliminate the parties’ right to appeal from the decision under Sec. 10 of the FAA, which provides grounds for the vacatur of an arbitration award. [read post]