Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 12,793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 8:28 am
” The legislation carves out two exemptions: 1) the prohibition does not apply in an M&A context where, as part of the transaction, the seller agrees not to compete with the purchaser’s business post sale and, immediately following the sale, becomes an employee of the purchaser; and 2) the prohibition does not apply to agreements with chief executive-level employees. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:39 am
Does Astreinte Belong to Enforcement? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:15 am
The purpose of the FLSA’s “bona fide executive” exemption, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
Weisdack, NO. 1:18-cv-00522, 2018 U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
This Kat thinks that it certainly does, and also thinks that it mostly comes down to the fourth step of the test for patentability, as approved by Jacob LJ. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
It results therefrom that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request does not involve an inventive step within the meaning of A 56 with respect to the disclosure of D3, having regards to the general knowledge of the person skilled in the art. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:02 am
That was not done here, and so this rule cannot be relied upon… [29] It may be that Rule 1-3 provides inherent jurisdiction to make an order restoring this action to the trial list for March 4, 2013. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:22 pm
Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 29 in Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Component Thereof (Inv. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 3:09 pm
Does it need help evaluating the slightly convoluted offer? [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The main points discussed in the debate were: 1. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
The wake is tomorrow (Saturday, 1/29) from 7pm-9pm and Sunday from 2pm-4pm and 7pm-9pm. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm
On March 29, 2010, in the highly publicized and closely watched case of Association for Molecular Pathology, et al v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:52 am
Plain wooden cross, £29. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:08 am
Cari Ann Hamilton brought suit against Starcom Mediavest Group, Inc., and Leo Burnett USA, Inc., alleging that they violated ERISA § 510, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:38 am
Div. 2012), A-5439-10T2, June 29, 2012: N.J.S.A. 3B:3-2 contains the technical requirements for writings intended as wills: a. [read post]
ENTRY BAN UPDATE: Clarifications to June 22 Proclamation Bring Even Worse News, Except for Canadians
1 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
., F-1, B-1/B-2, O-1, etc.) could later apply for an H, L or J visa and enter the United States. [read post]
ENTRY BAN UPDATE: Clarifications to June 22 Proclamation Bring Even Worse News, Except for Canadians
1 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
., F-1, B-1/B-2, O-1, etc.) could later apply for an H, L or J visa and enter the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:40 am
In other words, if an employer’s existing PTO plan offered at least the minimum amount of paid leave that could be used for the same (or more favorable) purposes of California Paid Sick Leave,[1] the employer could continue to use the PTO plan after July 1, 2015 without further modification. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
This section seeks to reproduce the existing law, however it does not do so as clearly as it might. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 10:09 am
Tenn. 1/29/04). 3. [read post]
