Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 4,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
Building on the First Circuit’s watershed Doe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
This does not contradict the general rule in Snell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
The other three applications were in respect of the word mark Bud, in Classes 32 (beers), 33 (alcoholic beverages), 35 (setting up databases, gathering data and information in databases), 38 (telecommunications, ie making available and supplying data and information, supplying and communicating information stored in databases), 41 (education, entertainment) and 42 (restaurant, bar and pub services; operating a database). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
Photo credit Christopher Lenney Does it really matter? [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:10 am
This historical preference does not foreclose the possibility of preemption, where applicable. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am
Powell, No. 1:21-cv-00040 (CJN) (D.D.C. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:14 am
The parties maintain the confidentiality of their compromise by submitting a stipulation for dismissal under Rule 41, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:51 am
That figures out to .675%, meaning that less than 1% of all DUI convictions involve a fatal accident. [read post]
RadLAX Oral Argument - Part II: What's Indubitably Bothering the Supreme Court Justices Equivalently
23 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
" (Ginsburg at 41.) [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
No. 4140-VCL, slip op. at 35, 36, 41 (Del. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
The new regime does not apply to questions asked in order to assess suitability for certain types of employment. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Grant, McLachlin C.J. recognises that this stark phrase has relevance to the doctrinal change she and her colleagues (including Binnie J.) are making (at [41]). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:09 pm
So what does this mean for the legal academy? [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
§ 1.9 (Department of Veterans Affairs); 41 C.F.R. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
’ He does not discuss the extensive Strasbourg jurisprudence concerning the balancing of Article 8 and Article 10 rights but, apparently, favours the US approach of granting unlimited freedom to the press. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
J Food Prot 68:2224-41. 14. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
For instance, Apple will receive an emergency legal request for data that will not require a search warrant in “exceptional situations” where (1) there is imminent and serious threat to the life or safety of an individual; (2) State security; or (3) security of critical infrastructure or installation. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:52 am
In what follows, I explain the decision and its significance by addressing the following issues: 1) the parties and their arguments, 2) the court’s statutory analysis 3), the court’s constitutional analysis, and 4) what happens next. 1) The Parties and their Arguments The government is the only traditional party in the case. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
., [1] decided by Vice Chancellor Noble last month, concludes the saga of the first triggering of a modern poison pill—and represents the first judicial scrutiny of a pill designed to protect a company’s net operating losses (“NOLs”). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:57 pm
Despite the due diligence, and even though Micromet had contacted another potential acquirer who was not interested, Amgen refused to increase its offer but reiterated a $9.00 per share offer on September 1, 2011. [read post]
