Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Second, the Village has taken the position that the single exit does not comply with the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code Act. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Second, the Village has taken the position that the single exit does not comply with the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code Act. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 9:05 pm
See, e.g., '458 patent col.1 ll.11-12, 40-41, 45-46, col.3 ll.33, 39-40, 45, col.4 ll.5-6, 20, 56.The counterpoint, of course, being not to read limitations of the specification into the claims.On claim differentiation: "When different words or phrases are used in separate claims, a difference in meaning is presumed. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:10 am
See, e.g., '458 patent col.1 ll.11-12, 40-41, 45-46, col.3 ll.33, 39-40, 45, col.4 ll.5-6, 20, 56. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:29 am by Susan Brenner
According to this opinion, the case arose when the plaintiff, Melanie Philbrook filed a complaint against 1) the City [of Malden]; 2) the Police Department; 3) Douglas F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
BT Industries AB, 41 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
BT Industries AB, 41 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
BT Industries AB, 41 Pa. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:14 pm
., the sale for importation, or the sale within the U.S. after importation of certain probe card assemblies and components thereof, certain probe card assemblies and components thereof, and certain tested DRAM and NAND flash memory devices and products containing same, in connection with claims 1, 3, 4, 18, 19, 23, 24, 29, 32, 33, 36, 37, and 41 of U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
" [1] Trademarks assist consumers when individuals take note of the packaging of merchandise, effectively lowering the search cost and providing a reliable guide to finding such items. [2]   When claims of trademark infringement arise, a creator must prove that the supposed infringer’s design is not functional and that their original design is distinctive and has acquired secondary meaning prior to the introduction of the possible infringer’s… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
”[3] Opponents argue that because the primary function of cheerleading is not competition, it does not meet the qualifications of a sport.[4] The answer to this debate depends on your definition of a sport.[5] The NCAA, the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
The 9th (Paez joined by Fisher and Robart) held that it does. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:58 am
The AmeriKat recommends that readers watch the hearings here (Peters' testimony, at the 41 minute mark). [read post]