Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 4,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 12:41 pm
Counts V and VI allege that ETI and Nevis, to the extent that Nevis does not have primary liability, aided and abetted the breaches alleged in Count IV. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:52 am
Some points worth pondering arising from the recent pleadings fight Both the movie studios and iiNet brought motions for summary judgment and/or to strike parts of the other side’s pleadings relating to the claims that (1) iiNet authorised infringement, (2) iiNet was liable as a primary infringer for actually reproducing the allegedly copied films and (3) whether or not iiNet was also liable in conversion. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 4:28 am
While it appears that Hinson expressed dissatisfaction with the recommendation, there is nothing in the record demonstrating that she ever made a request for a statement of reasons for the superintendent's recommendation in writing, as required.Accordingly, the Commissioner ruled that the failure to provide her with a written statement of reasons for the superintendent's recommendation does not warrant annulment of it's decision to terminate her probationary appointment,… [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
This, your Georgia state Senate voted 43-1 to endorse. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:37 am
He hired law firm 1, then fired it, and went on to law firm 2 and 3. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
See my full account of the legislative history of the sec. 45 "use in commerce" definition in my recent article at 43 Wake Forest L. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
"In Case C-43/08 ZVS Zeitungsvertrieb Stuttgart GmbH v President of the German Patent- und Markenamt the questions asked were very similar. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The FBI estimated that approximately $1 billion in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes targeted by Operation “Malicious Mortgage. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
The reasons advanced include:1. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:10 am
Code § 31-1-11.5-10. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
How does the court do this? [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:45 am
We do not have firm statistics in this area, but from a general overview of litigation it seems to us that a higher percentage of legal malpractice cases are subject to motions to dismiss under CPLR 3211(a)(1) than are other types of cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
In addition, appellant charged that Acumed's failure to pay the buy-out fee violated the Pennsylvania Commissioned Sales Representatives statute, 43 P.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
The ribbon is the #1 reason why, I “Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
In a 2-1 decision in Green v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:50 pm
Of course, this does not mean that there do not continue to be problems with lead in children's products. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:07 pm
As Gilbert points out, the question, as Koss posed it, is far too ambiguous: What does having sex "because" a man gives you drugs or alcohol signify? [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
Does the 'put it here for now' pile keep growing? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:20 pm
A 1% drop in revenue can--all else equal--lead to a 3% drop in profits. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D Texas: Yahoo’s sale of competitive keyword ads isn’t false designation of origin: Heartbrand Beef, Inc v Lobel’s of New York, LLC (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jones Day – Jones Day, BlockShopper.com settle hyperlink trade mark suit (The Trademark… [read post]
