Search for: "Head v State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 14,739
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Ganka v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:15 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
See comments by former head of the USPTO has called for abolishing Section 101. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
In other Supreme Court news, Peter Margulies assessed the oral arguments in Sessions v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Berry v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
In his 1819 opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:12 am
The best part of the New York Court of Appeals memorandum opinion in Haug v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d 109, 115 (D.D.C. 2004) (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am
United States (holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from home was a search), United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:26 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question that the Italian Supreme Court had to address in Ralph v Mediaset and Others, decision 14635/2018 [Katpat to Valentina Borgese for the heads up and the text of the decision]. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am
Comments This is the first Court of Appeal decision to address the Actavis questions head-on. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:42 pm
You can summarize this opinion fairly easily:Give the guy back his weed.It's not illegal under state law, so the state can't keep (or destroy) it if he's not charged with a crime. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:20 am
After stating why the controversy was not ripe and why the Court of Appeal would not address it, the Court of Appeal than addressed the controversy head on, finding that “[e]ven if this appeal presented a ripe dispute, we would find no error. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:35 am
United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
The Gazette has also covered the charging of a Head of News of BBC Asian Network for incidentially naming of a victim of sexual abuse. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:17 am
First, to presume that “would turn the standing question on its head” because federal courts lack jurisdiction unless the record shows that it exists. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
New York Times v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:56 pm
” signal, Zeidman v. [read post]
