Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Katz v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sept. 17, 2008), the United States District Court of Colorado held the presumptive lead plaintiff adequate to represent the class because its “contracts for difference” (“CFD) were “securities” under the Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Like many of these cases, the Deutsche Alt-A case was originally filed in state court, and removed by defendants to federal court. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:39 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Relationship to United States Citizens3. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
A patent holder should know what he owns, and the public should know what he does not. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically set forth… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 8:37 am
For additional information contact [www.gallerywatch.com] :
Subscription needed for online access:
12/15/2008
2008 Financial Report of the United States Government (PDF 1.53 MB)Issued by the Department of the Treasury12/15/2008
Complaint in the Matter of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:14 pm
” Morgenstern v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:27 am
Discussing the significance of the US ruling in Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp at the beginning of this month it reads, in relevant part: "Patents relevant to the use of a standard may be unenforceable if the patent holder withheld information during the standards development process, the Appeals Court in the United States (the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) concluded recently.The case related to the H.264 Standard for video compression developed… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:44 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 8:25 am
Chron., Oct. 29, 2008. 9 Elie Mystal, Thank God For Good Lawyers: Google Destroys Libraries, Not The Law, Above The Law, Oct. 29, 2008.10 Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
– Warners decisions to release cheap movie downloads in China and pull out of Korea (Techdirt) Netherlands New domain name option in the Netherlands - .co.nl (Managing Intellectual Property) New Zealand Copyright changes creates few ripples (Content Agenda) United Kingdom Olswang publishes ‘Convergence Consumer Survey 2008’ (IPKat) Federation Against Software Theft pushes 10 year jail time for UK infringers (Ars Technica)… [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 12:39 am
In Quality King Distributors v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
