Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: D. R." Results 4041 - 4060 of 26,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-Ga.) sent a letter questioning Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Acting Director Hugh Hurwitz about the suicide of accused sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein while in BOP custody. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
Pre-trial detention may only be used if the reasons for the measure outweigh the invasion or other injury that the measure causes the suspect or any other competing interest. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 11:56 am
Birkett, Pre-trial ‘Protective Measures for the Purpose of Forfeiture’ at the International Criminal Court: Safeguarding and balancing competing rights and interests [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The post Bribery-Related Securities Suit Based on Acquired Company’s Pre-Merger Activities appeared first on The D&O Diary. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:55 pm by Alexandra Haris
The Trump administration issued sanctions against Zarif that would block any property or interests he has in the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:55 pm by Alexandra Haris
The Trump administration issued sanctions against Zarif that would block any property or interests he has in the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:00 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
So lawyers, remember that you hired your marketing professionals for a reason – let them do their work in the effective and efficient way that they’d like to. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court answered the question in the negative, considering that Member States cannot lay down additional exceptions outside of Article 5.The fourth question concerned "…whether Article 5(3)(d) of [Directive 2001/29] must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘quotations'… extends to a situation in which it is not possible to identify the work concerned by the quotation in question".The Court first focussed on the requirements for quotation, which… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court answered the question in the negative, considering that Member States cannot lay down additional exceptions outside of Article 5.The fourth question concerned "…whether Article 5(3)(d) of [Directive 2001/29] must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘quotations'… extends to a situation in which it is not possible to identify the work concerned by the quotation in question".The Court first focussed on the requirements for quotation, which… [read post]