Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 4041 - 4060
of 4,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
C'est donc un cadeau que l'on se fait en mettant sur pied une telle conférence.C'est en France, avec Jérome Huet, que l'idée de cette conférence est née, entre 2 bouteilles de bourgogne dont il a oublié le nom... [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
C'est donc un cadeau que l'on se fait en mettant sur pied une telle conférence.C'est en France, avec Jérome Huet, que l'idée de cette conférence est née, entre 2 bouteilles de bourgogne dont il a oublié le nom... [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
C at 5). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:59 pm
Haden *David J. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 9:26 am
” S&C lands Mattingly: For those bank lawyers out there who long ago grew jealous of Rodge Cohen’s book of business, this might not come as good news: S&C announced last night that it’s nabbed J. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:56 am
I think in my heart, it's money well spent," District Attorney Michael J. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
See In re Paternity of B.N.C., 822 N.E.2d 616, 619 (Ind. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
Chin's "Doubts about Yick Wo" Lenese C. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
McDonough, J.Michael J. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:23 pm
Law Judge Arthur J. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
’: (Michael Geist), (The Trademark Blog), Globe and Mail report on new McGill study that concludes IP laws may be stifling innovation: (Michael Geist), C-61 – Dead or undead? [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:13 pm
Here's the abstract:Matière classique entre toutes du droit international, le droit des conflits armés a déjà donné lieu à beaucoup d'ouvrages, mais le temps passe, l'histoire s'accélère et le droit évolue. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
They're intensely as religious as I am religious. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
: (Chinese Law Prof Blog), China – The intellectual property rights crisis: (Ezine @rticles) Europe European Court of Justice to consider trade mark questions in Case C-342/08 Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel e.a. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:57 am
They're supposed to take direction from the Board. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
Most people misassume that 512(c) eliminates all liability for user-caused copyright infringement, but it only eliminates damages and limits the scope of injunctive relief in 512(j)--but a court can still issue an injunction. 512(j) is, as far as I know, not been litigated, and frankly I don't understand all of its provisions. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
J. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
C. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle:… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:05 am
"Chip" Bowles Jr. and Richard C. [read post]
