Search for: "James Case" Results 4041 - 4060 of 31,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 2:14 am
It has happened in a number of our cases. [read post]
25 May 2009, 9:14 pm
We handle accident cases on a contingent fee basis; you pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:51 am by Walter Olson
But preemption does not carry the day in an automotive case, Williamson v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:12 am by SCOTUStalk
Amy is joined by Steven Mazie of The Economist and SCOTUSblog’s James Romoser for a refresher on what’s at stake in those cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 11:46 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
Bowers was a passenger in a Cadillac driven by James Blakeman, 23, who died at the scene. [read post]
6 Feb 2006, 4:31 am
In an article in the Legal Intelligencer, President Judge James Gardner Colins and G. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
This is where the case makes its greatest contribution to 21st century jurisprudence. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:49 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:00 am by Record on Appeal
Rehnquist Center of the University of Arizona James E. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:43 am by Walter Olson
“This January, the justices stopped [attorney James] Wylder’s argument dead in its tracks once again, concluding that the McLean County Circuit Court should have dismissed his three negligence suits against Illinois Central Railroad. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Andrew Coan (University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:11 pm by Tom Smith
And yet, at the end of it all, he offered the absurdly counterintuitive position that no “reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges in such a case. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:02 pm
The three-judge panel in Washington today agreed with the administration that Miers shouldn't have to testify until the appeals court rules on the merits of the case, which tests the limits of executive privilege. [read post]