Search for: "Lovings v. State" Results 4041 - 4060 of 8,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
 The verbal description of the mark states: "The mark consists of a three dimensional ivory-coloured tile on the top surface of which is shown a letter of the Roman alphabet and a number in the range of 1 to 10". [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Ben
The action was filed with the United States District Court of New Mexico.In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:11 am
 The lyrics were also of a type: simple, subjected to a rigid scheme of rhyme and laced with such memorable sentiments such as "I was born to love you/And will never be free". [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
” Meanwhile, a writer for the online magazine AV Club interprets this as stating that DC Comics is “worried that everyone is an idiot. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:35 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Denial of Death Benefits Upheld by Court Because Decedent's Intoxicated State Excluded Him from Coverage: Fitzgerald v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Plaintiffs who lose are also described as fun-loving: loving Tolkien, loving Tiger King enough to tattoo it, etc. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was also an issue in the 1892 United States Supreme Court case, Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. [read post]